Hulda

[Hulda]

By all means you can join. Go to SovereignByDesign.com and check out the 3 free modules: Foundational Knowledge, Common Law and Private Life overview, Freedom Steps for Beginners. You have to become a member to view them, as SBD is private, but for those intro courses it’s free. Donations required for any of the other programs. Once you enroll in the PMA Structuring Solutions program (which centrally includes creating a private express trust), you’ll be able to attend the weekly Zoom Q&As (perhaps starting in January Zoom will be replaced by a platform that doesn’t gobble up ones rights to ones own content). That’s where I heard that “advanced” member share the things I mentioned. There’s another advanced member who’s also Canadian. Well, actually several. SBD is out of Canada (BC) and is heavily oriented towards Canadians, though support is also given to members in Australia and the US.

[Hulda]

I believe only the equitable interest (“equity”) in a house can be put into a trust. If your mortgage is paid off, you may be home free.

Otherwise you may fare better with a land patent AKA allodial title, if in the US (it’s indefeasible title in Canada), which can only be for the wo/man.

Don’t know anything about the ir/revocable angle.

[Hulda]

barre, I’ve heard that noticing the IRS with a Power of Attorney can be key in obtaining “compliance” in recognizing ones notice of “Revocation of Election to Pay”. I know of an example of it working wonders with the CRA (Canadian Revenue Agency, I believe).

Any thoughts on that?

Hulda

[Hulda]

Barre, thank you for your illumination of Anna von Reitz. I’ve had a gut disinclination towards her since I learned of her 2-3 years ago, though to be honest I’ve only read one article by her (on Frnak O’Collins). I will reconsider.

And thanks much for the English Equity Law primer. Fills in some gaps.

From my studies, I still find that the “founding fathers” weren’t the saviors that many, even in “our” movement, make them out to be. Wasn’t the Constitution a legal document for the debt occurred by them fathers for fighting the Brits? And didn’t the Paris Peace Treaty of 1783 identify George III as the “Prince Elector and Arch
Treasurer of the Holy Roman Empire and the United States of America”? So still in bondage (literally, eh?)

So much to sort out!

Hulda

[Hulda]

Wow hugh, you’ve put a huge amount of energy into this process and in sharing a guideline for it with us!

I’m still skeptical about asking the State to give me a national passport, to recognize that I’m off the plantation, but I’m open to exploring.

Earlier this year I contacted the office of the California Secretary of State about birth certificates. If I recall correctly, she said that there’s only one form, neither long nor short. But then I think she said there was one that had “more information” on it. So how to get a long form remains a mystery to me.

I also inquired about authentication. It sounded like they only do apostilles – for a specific country (I’d choose non-Hague) – not authentication, whatever that means. Can you explain the difference?

So I seem to be kinda stuck (even if/when convinced that this is a viable route to follow).

Thanks
Hulda

• This reply was modified 1 year, 7 months ago by  Hulda.

[Hulda]

What’s frustrating is having a percentage of my Social Security deducted because I receive a pension as a retired teacher. To prevent “double dipping”. As if I hadn’t paid into SSI. But I’m on a path of disentanglement from the worldwide sticky web, so it’s not really frustrating.

[Hulda]

No idea.

“My” Social Security is lower than Medicare costs, so they have me paying $3-4-500 per year to “meet” the premium. Stopped doing that a couple of years ago.

• This reply was modified 1 year, 6 months ago by  Hulda.

[Hulda]

As far as Social Security “running out” in the 2030’s, “they” have been “predicting” that for decades. Wasn’t that a mantra under Ray-Gun? Oh, look here:

https://www.fedsmith.com/2013/10/11/ronald-reagan-and-the-great-social-security-heist

fedsmith.com

Ronald Reagan And The Great Social Security Heist | FedSmith.com

The author says that the Social Security amendments passed under Reagan's presidency laid the foundation for 30 years of embezzlement of the trust funds.

[Hulda]

Thanks for that added info, barre. Does the Minnesota Assumed Name process replace getting a birth certificate authenticated? Or is that an unrelated process? What about a 98-6 EIN for a private express (foreign grantor) trust using the LFM (Last First Middle) all caps name and a 98-1 EIN for an unincorporated association using the FML all caps name? Don’t those EINs protect those 2 entities, bringing them under ones control?

What’s TCB? The “Free Dictionary” has a list a mile long of things it can stand for. I don’t recall encountering the acronym so far in my lawfare studies.

• This reply was modified 1 year, 6 months ago by  Hulda.

[Hulda]

It’s not giving a “government’ entity power of attorney, but noticing them of your own power of attorney, in essence, taking power of attorney back from them, which they (likely) have presumed, or taken without our giving them informed consent..

[Hulda]

Matia, that’s all I know. I’m not in Canada, but in a PMA/Banking Solutions program (for creating a private express trust with an unincorporated association as the trustee for which one can get bank accounts in the private) which is run by Canadians; many/most of the participants are Canadian. A Canadian, who’s one of the most advanced in the group, shared recently the success he’s having with the CRA after noticing them of his Power of Attorney.

[Hulda]

What I’ve learned/heard is that a land patent cannot go into a trust, as the former is only available to a living wo/man, which a trust is not; it’s an entity, even though it be a private one.

I’ve also learned/heard that we cannot put the entire property into a trust, only the equitable interest, which I believes means the “equity” we have in the house/land. Unless a mortgage has been “paid off”.

[Hulda]

barre, nice to have the history compiled so compactly. I was unaware of any loop holes in the Constitution for a camel’s nose. Can you comment on them?

So the Constitution was part of putting a chain link fence around the banksters’ puppets in DC? That would make it, as I’ve heard before, applicable only to the employees of US Inc., yes?

What happened in 1999 for us to miss the boat? I figure the Y2k false flag played a role, but certainly that wasn’t the only or maybe even the decisive sleeping pill. 9/11, being after the key year of 1999, was likely “icing on the cake”. Or rather, going for the jugular

From the perspective of your long years in the trenches and many battle scars, how do you reckon that we’re in better shape or on the cusp of breaking free? (You do, yes?) How does 2023/24 compare with 1933, the Flint Strike, 1945, 1968, the Montana Freemen of the 1990’s, to pick out a few more or less random “stops”?

[Hulda]

Elin, I’ve heard that a land patent can only go to the wo/man, not a trust. And I think I’ve heard that only equitable interest of real property can go into a trust.

So many angles (angels?)

Hulda

[Hulda]

Thanks for your 2 cents, Valerie. Would you consider the SF Bay Area group too far afield for you? Or maybe you’d want to start a Napa or Napa/Sonoma/Mendocino group?

Hulda

[Author]

Replies