Law & Sovereignty

[barre]

I just noticed a Status Correction mention on the PMA thread, so here’s some food for thought on the subject:

1) Political Status: American National, State Citizen etc. notices the Fed that you do not consent to 14th Amendment U.S. citizenship.

2) Commercial Status: the Secured Party Creditor process differentiates between Debtor & Creditor. Debtors waive all rights.

3) Law of Nations & War Powers Act: these lay the foundational understanding for formalizing Ambassador Status and that “I come in Peace”. Very powerful!

4) Taxpayer status: legal notice of “Revocation of Election to Pay”.

Any type of Status Correction begins with the internalization of your birthright for Self-Determination. If we don’t own this … any paperwork without exception is weak. When choosing to go through a SC process it’s important to match your needs with any or all of the above. Each of these obviously need great elaboration, and I anticipate a great sharing of ideas & experience here. I’ve personally done all of the above, and will be happy to share my thoughts, but look forward equally to learning from all of you.

Discussion

[hugh]

First of all, I want to thank you guys for sharing this information. I sat on this stuff for a couple of years before I actually acted on anything. You were the first credible resource that I came across and I’m glad I didn’t go down paths with some of the other groups ?

I would love to get your opinion on a couple minor points…

So the only one I haven’t studied much is getting the Ambassador status. Do you think that setting up a micronation is a good idea, or is it just icing on the cake?

Also, what are your thoughts on the amount of the lien for the SPC process? From what I understand, anything over $500M gets you on the radar, but is there much of a difference between $10M and $100M, in terms of being scrutinized?

Thanks.

[barre]

I’ve witnessed attempts at the formation of micro-nations, unique flags etc., but any such entity still has to convince militarized predator governments of its legitimacy or the rights of its members. Individual Ambassador status is clearly spelled out within international documents and treaties, with none of the red flags associated with group efforts. I was legitimately granted citizenship within a Native American Nation with official documents etc., but it was, of course, never honored by the “boys from downstairs” similar to our efforts to organize under the auspices of the U.S. Post Office etc. etc. … they all proved to be invaluable learning experiences, however.

The lien process can be effective, but the enforcement of big-ticket liens is impossible for most. Even the IRS cannot enforce a lien, so they instead issue a Notice of Lien to get around a legit Lien. They record the Notice at the County, and procure a certified copy 30 days from the recording to make it look like an authorized lien … unfortunately, they get away with it, because they can. Point is, most of us do not have armed agents to collect. BTW, many have been prosecuted for placing liens under bogus harassment & terrorism charges.

A very effective way to enforce liens of a 10k level is through a judgement obtained in the Private initiated by a notarized & cured, unrebutted Affadvit of Facts submitted to the clerk of a Small Claims Court … it comprises an undisputed final judgement that no court can rule against if properly witnessed, memorialized & administered. I’d admonish most to not try any of this unless operating at a very high level of knowledge.

• This reply was modified 1 year, 7 months ago by  barre.

[Cory]

If one has internalized their birthright of Self-Determination, what can one hope to gain by doing all the paperwork?
You are still going to be liable for taxes until you prove otherwise. You are still going to need an applicable knowledge of enforcement mechanisms to counter encroachments on your rights.. I agree with the overall sentiment, for sure, but you said it already, paperwork is weak.

[hugh]

Thank you, makes sense!

[Elin]

Question about Social Security – I’ll be submitting the Revocation of Election next year, and would like to take my social security – Is there any issue with taking that and not recontracting with the IRS? So far, the info I’ve gotten says it’s ok and doesn’t put me back in the “taxpayer” bucket. Correct? Which of the other 4 steps would be recommended to strengthen my non taxpayer status?

Question about jury duty – what’s the best way to get off the list and disqualify myself?

thanks for the answers in advance!

• This reply was modified 1 year, 7 months ago by  Elin.
• This reply was modified 1 year, 7 months ago by  Elin.

[Elin]

bumping this to see if anyone has thoughts on these two questions… thanks!!

[hugh]

I don’t know much about the SS question, but as far as I know, the best way to get out of jury duty is to remove yourself from voter registration and get your National passport. With the “privilege” of voting comes the responsibility of jury duty.

[Elin]

I did rescind my voter registration and still got the “summons” – ha! Still researching how to most effectively get off the jury rolls in honor… ??

[hugh]

Yeah the passport changes your status in the computers. Also remember that it’s simply an offer to contract, which you may have to challenge.

[Elin]

Indeed – good to know about the passport though. That should help for sure. Which is the best resource for teaching how to fill out the form for that? I’ve seen a couple versions, but would like to get it right the first time. thanks!!

[hugh]

The OSF free course is the best explanation I’ve seen. I also have post that summarizes all the information.

[James]

I too have filed ‘paperwork’ to renounce my 14th amendment citizen status. In my journey of attracting and finding what is true over 25 years, Law was the last pillar and that began to fall in late 19′ with my study of Universal Law. Early the following year, I was ensnared in a patriot pacification program (thank you Jason B) via AVR. Like most things I do, I jumped in head first and hit my head at the bottom of the pool about six months later after “things” got a little weird and “didn’t add up” after close examination of her and some of the materials. What a great experience though!

Included in the paperwork I filed was an ROE but I was just copying the content from others so my question to Barre and the group is:

When you file the ROE is there/was there anything specific that was cited or stated other than noting your standing in the state, relinquishment of 14th amendment slave status and election to no longer pay the federal vig/tax?

[hugh]

That’s basically it.

[Cory]

Without knowing any of the specifics surrounding your experience with the “patriot pacification”, it is interesting to me that it did not sour you on this entire thing. Care to elaborate a bit?

[James]

If I understand your question correctly; why I AM Still pursuing what is true even though I was snared into a controlled opposition operation?

History is history and the American republic was been covered up by the “democracy”. Part of that obfuscation is how citizens of states of a Republic have been designated citizens of Democracy (14th amendment). My motivation to engage with AVR, frankly wasnt personal. I was resonating with the rhetoric about re-instituting the de jur american government (republic) state-by-state; i was heavily involved until wising up. In that short time it became apparent to me that the operation was controlled by actors or worse MK-ULTRA….but I digress. 😉

The diabolical strategy of “controlled opposition” is what the patriot pacification program is; globalist traitors, often times backed by alphabet agencies, who profess to be Americans use their platform on-line (aided by logarithm) to “step into the vacuum” of the “opposition” to control narrative and “whats going on”.

When you look back at history and apply this war tactic to the evolution of industry things make much more sense. For example, how did the germ theory become “fact” without any facts? There were controlled opposition in place who were the ordained arbiters of truth but they were nothing more than actors with conflicts of interest (money, control etc). Generations later now we have people who have been indoctrinated into that theory as fact and don’t know any better.

That exact indoctrination dynamic applies in so many different areas like history and law. Its is true that we don’t have to pay income taxes but there are so many layers on top of that it can be difficult to uncover and apply in the face of indoctrination, peer pressure and intimidation.

Although there are ‘holes” in applying paperwork and it will never provide a turn-key solution, paperwork does demonstrate a major tenet of law:intent.

[Cory]

Thank you. Very interesting, man.

[Elin]

This guy’s channel is quite comprehensive and it looks at first glance that his info is solid. Thoughts? https://rumble.com/user/JoeLustica

[hugh]

Lusty has some good info, but I don’t have a lot of confidence in most of it. Seems like a lot of it could be theoretical, since he doesn’t back it up with much evidence that it works. Worth watching though, I like him.

The best resource I’ve found so far is JCL: https://www.youtube.com/@thebadwolf

youtube.com

James C Lovett

www.Blacksite32.com My Personal - The Badwolf Media Channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrDkHPAbgmVkkRGTLT_o7pw Patreon Support: www.Patreon.com/jamesclovett RUMBLE: https://rumble.com/register/jamesclovett/ Contact: USNationalPassport@yahoo.com Consultation Fee: $75.00 hr. Consult. Weekend Sunday Rates: 30min $100.00 / 60min $150.00 Contains "PAID LINKS" per FTC.

[Mike]

yes, very informative channel! Watched a lot of his stuff, he really gets the UCC stuff

[Elin]

Thanks Hugh… I like Joe’s explanations in plain language, which helps with the processes I’ll be doing with other mentorship (aka Weiss and Assoc.). I might also check out JCL… even though he’s doing the one eye thing in the photo… LOL

[hugh]

Haha, he’s also a Freemason if that helps. But seriously, I’ve done a couple of private consultations with him and he really knows his stuff.

Also check out Lustica’s podcast buddy, Brandon Joe Williams (OneStupidFuck.com). He’s fairly new to all of this, so you have to triple check his information, but he is one of the best at explaining the concepts in a simple, concise manner. I recommend his free course. He show results, good and bad.

[Elin]

OSF is entertaining for sure – – and interesting about the freemason angle. There seem to be pros and cons to that.

[Elin]

excellent thanks!

[Hulda]

barre, I’ve heard that noticing the IRS with a Power of Attorney can be key in obtaining “compliance” in recognizing ones notice of “Revocation of Election to Pay”. I know of an example of it working wonders with the CRA (Canadian Revenue Agency, I believe).

Any thoughts on that?

Hulda

[Matia]

Could you elaborate as to the experience with CRA? I looked up the Revocation of Election to pay and it seems a very interesting start.

[Hulda]

Matia, that’s all I know. I’m not in Canada, but in a PMA/Banking Solutions program (for creating a private express trust with an unincorporated association as the trustee for which one can get bank accounts in the private) which is run by Canadians; many/most of the participants are Canadian. A Canadian, who’s one of the most advanced in the group, shared recently the success he’s having with the CRA after noticing them of his Power of Attorney.

[James]

Giving your POA to a government “body” seems…….crazy. I’m curious to hear more as it evolves.

[Hulda]

It’s not giving a “government’ entity power of attorney, but noticing them of your own power of attorney, in essence, taking power of attorney back from them, which they (likely) have presumed, or taken without our giving them informed consent..

[barre]

POA is critical for certain processes … big subject though! It’s also important to have noticed the Court that you have formalized your right in the Public to represent the NAME. Every state has very difficult-to-find ways of doing this, but the Minnesota Secretary of State still has an Assumed Name | Certificate of Assumed Name readily available in a non-occulted form. You can do it on-line for 50.00.

I would also remind that we should never end up in Court unless shackled and dragged there! Court is not where we belong, and it is actually illegal to be there unless we unwittingly traverse the Rubicon due to double-mindedness. If it’s absolutely necessary to TCB the Certificate of Assumed Name gives standing to do so without committing copyright infringement.

assumednameregistration.pdf 401 KB PDF - Click to view

Options

• Copy Download Link

[Hulda]

Thanks for that added info, barre. Does the Minnesota Assumed Name process replace getting a birth certificate authenticated? Or is that an unrelated process? What about a 98-6 EIN for a private express (foreign grantor) trust using the LFM (Last First Middle) all caps name and a 98-1 EIN for an unincorporated association using the FML all caps name? Don’t those EINs protect those 2 entities, bringing them under ones control?

What’s TCB? The “Free Dictionary” has a list a mile long of things it can stand for. I don’t recall encountering the acronym so far in my lawfare studies.

• This reply was modified 1 year, 6 months ago by  Hulda.

[pamela]

Hey barre,

I’ve re acquainted with Anna von recently and learned of the most recent revelations going back to the beginning of the fraud starting with Queen Anne, Elizabeth II Coronation oath/Social Contract violation, the fraud of Great Britain, and the lawsuit known as Regina v JAH (john anthony hill). If I understand correctly the British Corpse were not formed properly by a lawful authority and Queen Anne broke the contract 3 days after coronation and never occupied the thrown. If this is true and hence all that follows including here on this soil, then would it make sense to still do a status correction? I really take my time in such moves as to not engage with fraudulent systems such as the one we allegedly have had since this time. Opinions ? Thoughts? Thanks so much ~

[missmish]

Hulda, you mentioned an advanced group member who is canadian.. is this group open to including more members? Like myself who is canadian ?

[Hulda]

By all means you can join. Go to SovereignByDesign.com and check out the 3 free modules: Foundational Knowledge, Common Law and Private Life overview, Freedom Steps for Beginners. You have to become a member to view them, as SBD is private, but for those intro courses it’s free. Donations required for any of the other programs. Once you enroll in the PMA Structuring Solutions program (which centrally includes creating a private express trust), you’ll be able to attend the weekly Zoom Q&As (perhaps starting in January Zoom will be replaced by a platform that doesn’t gobble up ones rights to ones own content). That’s where I heard that “advanced” member share the things I mentioned. There’s another advanced member who’s also Canadian. Well, actually several. SBD is out of Canada (BC) and is heavily oriented towards Canadians, though support is also given to members in Australia and the US.

[missmish]

Thank you so much! I wish Canadians were more like Americans sometimes lol everyone here acts entitled to freedom but no one acts on it! It’s weird. Lol

[Hulda]

From what I’ve seen over the past 3½+ years, Michellyn, there are a lot of Canadians acting on being free and plenty of Americans not.

[barre]

Hey Pamela

I believe your spot on with your comments especially … why should we even bother notifying a bunch of fraudulent usurpers in the first place?! Here’s where their reptilian lawfare comes to play. Their “legalalese” is based within the commercial code book (UCC), which is governed by contract.

Any commercial offer ie. purchasing groceries or receiving a notice of estimated tax owed to the IRS constitutes an offer that requires a response to either reject or accept. A non-response is then construed as acceptance, and in the convoluted world of corporate commerce it means that you accept the full “terms & conditions”, and failure to perform is tantamount to a contract breach with all of the related liabilities attached including throwing you into the castle dungeon.

A Status Correction is nothing more than a rebuttal of any assumption that you are a contractable corpse rather than a sovereign sentient being. Agreed, it’s total bs which should require no thing from anybody, but “we” let them get away with the scam to the point where the death cult holds all of the legal, financial and governmental marbles. Unless we rebut all contractual assumptions any unanswered commercial offer can have consequences based on non-performance.

Status Correction simply preempts all such “offers”, but don’t mistake this as a get out of jail-free card, as SC will still need to be enforced against a very real criminal syndicate. The SC is an evidentiary formal declaration that can definitely lend support to your conditional acceptance of any commercial offerings, however.

A Conditional Acceptance is an all-important “lawful” response that would go something like this … I accept your offer to pay the estimated tax owed under the condition that you give formal evidence in writing that I am a federal employee or have agreed to perform under the tax codes restricted to U.S. “citizens”.

My personal opinion is that it’s very late in the game and the hay is in the barn either way. There may, or may not be time to play such games any longer … the beast has already defeated itself, and it has no recourse, as is already happening, to pull out all stops. Is there still time for SC etc. etc.? It’s valuable learning, but you’ll need to decide if it’s where you wish to put your energy while the Titanic is going down.

[Steven]

Like Barre said, and I agree, I think the time for these kinds of things (SC’s and other various “legal” things) is coming to an end. The system they’ve built is crumbling and whatever is built from the ashes, whatever we create, won’t have room for such legalese silliness. Because let’s face it, they are definitely NOT going to get away with their new agenda.

The time has now come to remove ourselves from the system, and move our businesses and lives back to the private. I realize for a lot of people that’s not cut and dry simple! Many of us still have so much bound up in the Public. For me, I had nothing Public, save for a credit card. Moving my business and life into the Private was simple. I’m still learning to navigate certain things, and yes I do use certain public services still, but for the most part STEVEN MCCORMICK is nearly non existent.

I don’t mean to dump on any strategies people are trying, or anything anyone has presented here! I just have to wonder how much of it is worth trying during this endgame.

[hugh]

Totally agree that the system is toast.

However, gigantic systems tend to have more resilience than most people give them credit for. I remember people saying that the system will go down in 2008…and here we are. It could be 30 years before we see the actual collapse, nobody knows. I can also potentially see a split society where we may still have to interface with them occasionally.

So still I see a lot of benefit in putting some very basic defenses in place. Many of these processes are also surprisingly easy to do.

No right or wrong here, just depends on each person’s situation and how they want to roll.

[hugh]

How to your change citizenship status in your social security database entry. Makes sense to me, another way to separate the living from the strawman trust.

The passport verification can also be used to substantiate status, in addition to the simple affidavit he talks about.

Completely optional, of course.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=euQpwyRzyyc

[Author]

Replies