Law & Sovereignty

[barre]

For those of you unfamiliar with Anna Von Reitz, she authors very insightful newsletters on a regular basis, and this one dropped just recently. I’ve followed her for a long while, and have to say that she knows her stuff, although I do tend to deviate into different approaches relative to “process”. Not that she’s wrong, but any legit method needs to align with your unique situation, and how far you’re ready to stick your neck out.

This post relates to an article from Armstrong Economics explaining the English “Legal” System — that is, the polluted system of Equity Law created by Scottish Admiralty Barrister Lord Mansfield in the 1750’s.

Armstrong Economics decries the lawlessness of this legal system. So did our Forefathers, voting with their feet in 1776.

Here’s the key missing bit, folks — it’s not our system breaking down. It’s the British Territorial System breaking down.

Here’s the news, a 150 years late, but still true:

1. We, Americans, are not naturally any kind of “United States Citizen”; we are American State Nationals and we don’t need to be anything else.

2. We, Americans, don’t stand under any Constitution. Our Federal employees are the ones obligated to perform under the Constitutions.

We, Americans, stand under The Unanimous Declaration of Independence, instead.

3. We, Americans, don’t live in a democracy; we live in the republican States of the Union.

4. We, Americans, don’t live under the British Legal System, unless we conduct business on the High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways.

We, Americans, live under our Lawful American Court System, which is being restored right now.

So everything in this article from Armstrong Economics posted below is interesting and insightful, but neither the King’s Bench nor the Queen’s Bench have any business addressing rank and file Americans — and that is precisely the reason their Legal System is breaking down.

It never applied to us, but they fraudulently entrapped us in it, and used it to fleece us blind.

The British Court System misapplied here has been part of a National-Level Identity Theft and Credit Fraud Swindle promoted by our two erstwhile foreign Federal Municipal Corporation Subcontractors residing in the District of Columbia.

Americans have been deliberately confused with “Residents” — foreign citizens allowed to be in this country under the provisions of the Residence Act for the purpose of providing us with “essential government services” per Article IV of all Federal Constitutions.

We are not “residents” in our own country. We are part of the natural civilian population.

The British Legal System applies to British Territorial U.S. Citizens living here as residents in this country, not to us.

But in 1865, this venal British institution crept ashore and started operating here as an undisclosed war reparations collection agency in the devastated Southern States.

The British Territorial U.S. Government created Military Districts and [Military] District Courts that became famous as “Carpetbagger Courts” because they were run by strangers from the North who arrived in town carrying “carpet bags” — cheap luggage at the time.

Of course, they were strangers. They were British Admiralty and Maritime Court Lawyers — just like Abe Lincoln, enrolled in the Illinois Bar in 1834.

Why would a lawyer in Springfield, Illinois, be studying Admiralty and Maritime Law in 1834?

Springfield, Illinois, is land-locked.

The nearest large body of water is Lake Michigan, 200 miles away.

Just sayin’. Lincoln was recruited.

Water seeks its own level and he was lower than the bilge in one of Queen Victoria’s frigates.

The following year, 1866, this cozy deployment of foreign courts on our land and soil was challenged in the U.S. Supreme Court and resolved by Ex Part Milligan, 2 USC 71, which provided that these British Courts had to stand down as soon as our normal civilian courts were restored.

Thanks to nobody telling us, it’s been 157 years and this same venal foreign British System has spread throughout the country and continued to fleece and cheat and illegally confiscate assets and property from Americans under False Pretenses ever since.

We are finally reopening our American Common Law Courts. The foreign courts of “strictly limited jurisdiction” are being Notified and the Exodus is underway, though most of the King Rats left this country 30 years ago.

All this British-sponsored unjust enrichment and illegal confiscation is now coming to an end and the Bar Association Members who have acted as the British Raj in America are feeling the heat.

Imagine Clint Eastwood saying, “Do you feel lucky?”

There’s only one of two possible conclusions: the Bar Members were so ignorant and incompetent they didn’t know their own business and didn’t know what they were doing to their countrymen — or they were perfectly well aware and committing inland piracy just the same.

The punishment for inland piracy, which is still on the books– is gibbeting. The prisoner is placed in an iron cage which is welded shut and hung from a convenient post, often at a crossroads. Mother Nature, the elements, and the birds and insects are left to do their work. This is how the tradition of crossroads being haunted got its start.

I have advised all Bar Members to throw in their cards and vacate their seats. Hired Jurists have to ask themselves how much a job is worth.

Start studying American Common Law and pre-1750 British Common Law.

Next time you hear anyone talking about the King’s Bench or the Queen’s Bench, remember that “Bench” means “Bank” — they’ve been “banking on” the hapless American Public for 160 years.

Literally.

Bear in mind that this was done under conditions of secrecy and color of law against an unarmed civilian population that was loyally paying their wages.

Next time you see King Charles on the tele, mentally put some big furry rat ears on him, draw some whiskers, and see what you see.

Discussion

[pamela]

Thank you barre ~ it’s been many years since I’ve heard of Anna Von Reitz. She made so much sense to me when I last read her stance on this quagmire many years ago. It’s difficult to find much on her (using Brave) let alone get on her email list. Any suggestions? She’s a straight shooter and I appreciate her aim.

[barre]

Thx Pamela! All of Anna’s up-to-date work is here: http://www.paulstramer.net/ … have fun!

• This reply was modified 1 year, 7 months ago by  barre.

paulstramer.net

Paul Stramer - Lincoln County Watch

Paul Stramer, Oath Keepers, Anna Von Reitz, and other patriots work for freedom and peace for your family in America.

[Hulda]

Barre, thank you for your illumination of Anna von Reitz. I’ve had a gut disinclination towards her since I learned of her 2-3 years ago, though to be honest I’ve only read one article by her (on Frnak O’Collins). I will reconsider.

And thanks much for the English Equity Law primer. Fills in some gaps.

From my studies, I still find that the “founding fathers” weren’t the saviors that many, even in “our” movement, make them out to be. Wasn’t the Constitution a legal document for the debt occurred by them fathers for fighting the Brits? And didn’t the Paris Peace Treaty of 1783 identify George III as the “Prince Elector and Arch
Treasurer of the Holy Roman Empire and the United States of America”? So still in bondage (literally, eh?)

So much to sort out!

Hulda

[barre]

Yes, but there were mitigating circumstances that led the “Founding Fathers”, especially GW to go down that road. It was up to us/them to prohibit U.S. Inc. from trespassing beyond the chain link fence around DC as established by the Constitution for the united States of America, and we received ample warnings along the way.

The Constitution of the United States of America followed with some very subtle loop holes that allowed the camel’s nose to get under the tent. GW worked directly with St. Germaine and he later embodied as guy Ballard who received the dictations directly from St. Germaine under the pen name of Godfre Ray King that would become known as the “Green Books” from the St. Germaine Press. The Founders were definitely a mixed bag complete with Rothschild agents, most notably, Alexander Hamilton.

The Constitution was created by its “constitutors” for the purposes of abrogating the war debt to a private corporation ie. Washington D.C. Inc. (loaned to them by the Rothschilds via Lafayette of France. Agents for D.C. Inc. approached the populous with an offer to assume suretyship for the war debt and were met with a resounding “hell no!” The first of three 70 year bankruptcy phases were then initiated.

1st 70 yrs. followed by default: the industrial north was appointed as surety to channel wealth directly to the City of London;

2nd 70 yrs. followed by default: this required the war of Northern aggression, in which the lands of the South were confiscated to act in suretyship for the next 70 yrs;

3rd 70 yrs. followed by default: the Great Depression and issuance of Berth Certificates created legal entities in our NAME, which could be farmed for the next 70 years. HJR 192 gave us a loophole and “them” a get-out-of-jail free card if ever busted for slave trafficking.

In 1999 Debt forgiveness followed the three successive defaults on the war debt, and we were all free from bondage. I’ll be darned if we weren’t all soundly put to sleep, and didn’t exercise our option to exit the matrix when we had the chance … so they’ve volunteered for us every year since.

Are we all having fun yet?!

[Hulda]

barre, nice to have the history compiled so compactly. I was unaware of any loop holes in the Constitution for a camel’s nose. Can you comment on them?

So the Constitution was part of putting a chain link fence around the banksters’ puppets in DC? That would make it, as I’ve heard before, applicable only to the employees of US Inc., yes?

What happened in 1999 for us to miss the boat? I figure the Y2k false flag played a role, but certainly that wasn’t the only or maybe even the decisive sleeping pill. 9/11, being after the key year of 1999, was likely “icing on the cake”. Or rather, going for the jugular

From the perspective of your long years in the trenches and many battle scars, how do you reckon that we’re in better shape or on the cusp of breaking free? (You do, yes?) How does 2023/24 compare with 1933, the Flint Strike, 1945, 1968, the Montana Freemen of the 1990’s, to pick out a few more or less random “stops”?

[Author]

Replies