Health & Wellness

Frequency Specific Microcurrent Therapy/Dr. Carolyn McMakin

  • Creator
    Discussion
  • #386170

    maryschurr
    Participant

    I thought this might be of interest to some folks here. The video is from 12/2021 and I will post the site with the podcast which has the transcript if that works better for some. I was interested in learning more about how she has learned to use frequency for healing. She has been doing this for at the very least 20 some years and now teaches it. The last few statements she makes in the videos are not exactly what I would like to hear (infections, antibiotics), but over all it is interesting in how many muscular, spinal related, and other types injuries are healed by the body using frequencies. How emotions play a part and the frequencies uses are discusses as well. I heard about her from Dr. Robert Gilbert of the Vesica Institute. He is currently having a sale on his courses, BTY. ?

    Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MNcFEduCDwE

    Podcast with transcript https://www.neu.fit/resources/episode-31-frequency-specific-with-dr-carolyn-mcmakin

    This seems to be one of her sites. She may have different sites for the equipment vs the training.

    https://frequencyspecific.com/

    • This discussion was modified 1 year, 3 months ago by  maryschurr.
  • Author
    Replies
  • #386174

    Brendan
    Member

    Hi Mary,

    FSM has been a wonderful tool in my practice for many years and I have helped teach the courses with Carol.

    If you have any questions feel free to ask away! 🙂

    Brendan

    • #386180

      Erin
      Member

      Hi Brendan, I’m curious what type of device you use/recommend for applying FSM? I have been using a Healy for a few months with wonderful results, but I feel like there is still so much to learn about how to best use this technology. Curious what resources you might recommend? Thank you!

      • #386189

        Brendan
        Member

        Hi Erin,

        I use the precision distributing devices, I know a lot of folks use the InspirStar but the precision devices are built like tanks and have lasted me over a decade so far.

        If you’re a practitioner I would definitely recommend the courses. The totality of what they can do is fantastic and incredibly powerful. Some of the thinking is very “germ theory” when it comes sections of the course but the devices have unlimited programming options and I use them a bit different than taught in most instances. It is a big task to learn the language of the frequencies but well worth it.

        If you’re not I would recommend finding someone in your area who uses them and experience it yourself 🙂

        • #386193

          Erin
          Member

          Thanks so much for sharing your insights and experience. I am a practitioner and have been looking for ways to expand my practice.

  • #386179

    Erin
    Member

    Thank you for sharing this, Mary. I know of Carolyn McMakin because of her work with Healy as she has created some of their frequency programs.

    • #386185

      Erin
      Member

      Just finished listening and I am feeling inspired to take Carolyn’s courses!

  • #386184

    lorrie555
    Member

    Hello Mary,

    I also use FSM in my practice. I use the InspirStar Professional and Wellness devices.

    Lorrie

  • #386205

    maryschurr
    Member

    It is wonderful to hear that so many of you have experience with this! I am exploring the questions I may have and I appreciate you all offering to answer. It sounds like an amazing tool in your toolboxes.

  • #386251

    Dale
    Member

    Yes was looking at a few of these devices. Interesting history on how they buried this technology. Was looking for solution for bladder disfunction.

  • #386303

    Michael
    Member

    A radionics colleague, trustworthy source, told me that FSM was originally based on a radionics rate book. The book wasn’t labeled, and I believe it was Dr. McMakin that found the book. No one knew what the numbers were and someone assumed they were frequencies. I don’t know the rest of the story on the development of amplitude etc.

    • This reply was modified 1 year, 3 months ago by  Michael. Reason: Added a tag
    • #386312

      Dale
      Member

      Lots of these devices are of Russian origin. The MiHealth Device by NES for instance. There was another one that the US supplier was bragging about reverse engineering a Russian Device. So many of the manufacturers do not know the principle of operation. And looking into these radionics devices they had codes for healing and codes for harm. So that is exactly what these Big Harma drugs are doing. Broadcasting harmful energy signatures.

      • #386341

        David
        Member

        Are these the same as Royal Rife frequencies?

        • #386425

          Michael
          Member

          As far as I know, Rife and FSM frequencies are not related.

      • #386426

        Michael
        Member

        Hi Dale,

        Do you have any sources for the MiHealth-Russian device connection? I would be interested in pursuing more on that subject.

        Bruce Lipton has an interesting related quote –

        “Information can be carried by chemistry, and information can be carried by vibration. The question is whether one is better than the other.”

        • #386429

          Dale
          Member

          NES miHealth | miHealth Bioelectric Health Device (neshealth.com)

          I had a consultation with NES as I wanted to get one for a private practice. During our discussion I mentioned I tried to purchase a similar device from Russia but was blocked by my bank. This was before the war. He said they did license some of the features from a Russian Company. Most US companies just reverse engineer the devices and cut out the Russian inventors. I had warned an interested Russian inventor that contacted me. Seems like China is not the only one stealing Intellectual Property. What I like about this system is the scanner finds deficient energy systems and then provides codes for the miHealth device to correct those systems. The report was accurate even revealing emotional blocks. I did a 90 day trial. There was a video on The View and the ladies were fighting over the device because it was on Vagus Nerve Stimulation. 🙂

          • #386431

            Michael
            Member

            Thank you Dale, your first hand description is very helpful. I was wondering how much of their system was internally developed. I’m glad to hear that they licensed the technology.

            Are you still using it? One of the criticisms I’ve heard of that system, and other similar diagnostic tools, is that you can get different readings within short periods of time, sometimes significantly different.

            • #386432

              Dale
              Member

              One of the limitations I did not like was they only allowed 1 scan every 5 or 7 days.

              The whole premise I wanted to explore was doing a scan. Try a herbal protocol or whatever and do a rescan to detect positive changes. I think they lifted that restriction but don’t know how long between scans. Because you are measuring a dynamic system changes can happen rapidly. Basically a snap shot in time. No I did not purchase because of that limitation. I did recieve a notice that the restriction was lifted trying to entice me to buy.

              • This reply was modified 1 year, 3 months ago by  Dale.
            • #386434

              Dale
              Member

              A recent development regarding security came up. I follow a computer / electronic expert and he warned that any device made in China or device made with Chinese components could be used for spying. We are not talking about what you are reading online but what is going on inside your body. So I am researching devices now on those criteria. Especially devices that scan the body.

            • #386441

              Brendan
              Member

              This has been alluded to me on several occasions which is why I don’t use any devices that “scans” and therapy devices made entirely in the US. Plus, I have had several interesting conversations with folks who have had “scans” done at different facilities and been left far worse for many reasons.

              Also to second what Dr. Lando has said in the past moving away from these techniques and back into radiesthesia/ dowsing/ biogeometry methods.

            • #386445

              Dale
              Member

              I have completely ditched the cel phone for this reason. One technology I seen was Geenie. Oh we can do a remote scan just have to give us permission. A little deeper dig on this, the cel phone is a ‘Smart Device’ and looking at its definition they can put any chip they want into the device and it completely bypasses the operating system of the smart phone. Any chip can be turned into a hostile radionics device.

Log in to reply.